understanding and resisting
NEOLIBERALISM
By Ian MacDonald
Three decades ago, a contagion by the name of
“neoliberalism” broke out of the centres of capital
accumulation and spread from there to engulf the rest of the world.
In its growth phase, the doctrine of the supremacy of
the free market moved rapidly from marginal economic thinkers and ruling
class warriors such as Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Augusto
Pinochet to the mainstream of politics, journalism and academia.
By the 1990s even the strongest social democratic
parties had written neoliberalism into their platforms or were implementing
neoliberal policies when in power. Nothing did more to sustain the claim
that there was no alternative to neoliberalism than this capitulation of
the left.
But we have now entered a period of gathering, if
uneven, revolts against neoliberalism and those who have surrendered to it.
In Western Europe and much of Latin America, a new
politics of resistance is confronting renewed attacks on workers and the
welfare state, producing deep crises in these societies.
This is raising a number of pressing political
questions and drawing new layers of activists into longstanding debates in
Marxist political economy.
What is neoliberalism? Where did it come from? Most
importantly, how do we get rid of it?
David Harvey, a US-based Marxist best known as the
author of The Condition of Postmodernity (1989) and The New
Imperialism (2003), squarely addresses each of
these questions in his not-to-be-missed new book, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (2005).
What is neoliberalism?
Neoliberalism is most commonly understood as a set of
ideas and policies which seek to expand the sphere of the market by rolling
back the powers of the state. Social democratic critiques of neoliberalism
engage with it on this basis: neoliberalism is a series of mistaken
policies, a utopian vision bound to fail, or a specifically Anglo-American
cultural or institutional phenomenon. Alternatives to neoliberalism within
capitalism are viable if you elect a party with the right ideas.
Harvey rejects these views.
He makes a clear argument that neoliberalism is above
all a political project to restore class power in the context of a
sustained global crisis of capital accumulation.
Neoliberalism is too pervasive and long lasting to be
a mistake. It has not failed to solve economic problems because it was not
designed for this purpose. It has not, Harvey maintains, resolved the
crisis of accumulation – world growth rates remain at historic lows.
But from the perspective of capital, it has been
effective in restoring their social power. Workers everywhere are now
working harder, with less security, for longer hours and less pay.
Neither should neoliberalism be dismissed as a blight
of Anglo-American civilization or as a project of the American state, as
some on the left are arguing. The pattern of its diffusion, its present
universality and national variations do not fit these hypotheses well.
Harvey’s defense of a Marxist understanding of
neoliberalism is the strongest and most useful aspect of the book. If
neoliberalism “looks like class struggle and acts like class war then
we have to name it unashamedly for what it is.”
Where did it come from?
During the postwar economic boom, workers throughout
advanced capitalist countries had been able to win significant concessions.
Harvey shows how inequality was declining in theses societies – to
the detriment of ruling class power – as labour movements and social
democratic parties grew bolder. If capitalists felt squeezed in the booming
postwar economy, they became absolutely desperate to reverse this trend
with the onset of economic crisis in the 1970s.
It was not immediately obvious that states would
respond to the crisis with the neoliberal policies that are now routinely
applied. At first, ruling elites reached for the ideas at hand and
implemented a recharged Keynesianism. Left parties in Europe, riding a wave
of working class militancy, went further in pushing social democratic and
corporatist solutions, even proposing to buy out the ruling class as in
Sweden.
This was very alarming to capitalists on both sides
of the Atlantic. To protect themselves from “economic and political
annihilation”, as Harvey puts it, the power of the working class had
to be broken.
The failure of reformist attempts at restarting
economic growth opened the way for a more noxious prescription. The
capitalist class reorganized politically. It dusted off old reactionary
ideas and spent lavishly to promote them; it sought out the divisions
within the working class and forced the issue of who had the power.
Harvey dwells on this moment of crisis, and some of
the more interesting sections of the book deal with how neoliberalism was
imposed in concrete situations.
There are, he suggests, two models of transition: the
violent path typified by Pinochet’s US-backed coup in Chile, and the
handling of New York City’s 1975-77 fiscal crisis. The latter
demonstrated that even in the US’s most unionized, social democratic
city, all power could be handed to the bankers, and workers’
standards of living could be drastically reduced without having to call in
federal troops (as the Mayor at the time feared would be necessary).
The chapter on the emergence of neoliberalism in
China – “Neoliberalism with Chinese Characteristics”
– is the best available explanation of the complexities of
China’s insertion into neoliberal globalization and the emerging
tensions between Chinese and American capitalism.
How can it be resisted?
Harvey is concerned with how neoliberalism as a form
of class rule is able to sustain itself in liberal democracies.
Provocatively – and problematically – he suggests that
neoliberalism was able to build a broad societal consensus by appealing to
the desire of individual liberty raised by the revolts of 1968.
The movement of 1968 demanded both liberty and social
justice. Neoliberalism offered the former at the expense of the latter by
dismantling a heavily interventionist state and confronting the powers of
union bureaucracies.
This does not sit well with his observation, also in
the book, that neoliberalism rode the backlash politics of racism,
anti-feminism and anti-gay bigotry – all reactions to the
emancipatory spirit of ‘68.
Here Harvey makes a bad misstep by explaining the
reproduction of neoliberalism in the 1990s under Clinton and Blair in terms
of cultural and ideological transformations, rather than returning to the
competitive pressures of the world market and defeat of the left as in his
earlier analysis.
“Perhaps the greatest testimony to [Thatcher
and Reagan’s] success”, he writes, “lies in the fact that
both Clinton and Blair found themselves in a situation where their room for
manoeuvre was so limited that they could not help but sustain the process
of restoration of class power even against their own better
instincts.”
Harvey writes feelingly of the devastation wrought by
neoliberalism and celebrates the variety of resistances that have
challenged it.
His belief, however, that Thatcher’s project of
changing our souls has succeeded – “we are all neoliberals
now” – leads him to lower his expectations of this resistance.
In trying to find a footing for radical politics in
the American collective memory, he reaches for Roosevelt.
Better to recall the heroic struggles – the
strikes in Toledo, Minneapolis and San Francisco – that managed to
wring out the concessions from his government.
Perhaps Harvey has become overly pessimistic as a
result of writing the little black book of neoliberalism. Perhaps too he is
extending a hand to a liberal readership, easing their transition to
socialist politics.
Harvey is, after all, a revolutionary. When asked
what he wanted for his birthday (the launching of A Brief History coincided with
the celebration of his 70th) he replied, “Revolution, of
course!”
Neoliberalism is the way that capitalism is now, and
it affects everything that we do as socialists. A Brief History of Neoliberalism should
be read and engaged with. Buy the hardcover and share it with a friend.
David Harvey A Brief History of Neoliberalism
Oxford, 2005 247 pages $45 hardcover
Socialist Worker 460
19 November 2005 www.socialist.ca